A Statistical View of Some Chemometrics Regression Tools
By L. Frank, Jerome H. Friedman. 1993
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jianqing Fan
- Francis R. Bach
- Cun-Hui Zhang
- Victor Chernozhukov
- Alexandre Belloni
- Peter Buhlmann
- Martin J. Wainwright
- Yoshua Bengio
Citations in the corpus
- Best Subset Selection via a Modern Optimization Lens (2015, methodology): “To address the shortcomings, non-convex penalized regression is often used to “bridge” the gap between the convex `1 penalty and the combinatorial `0 penalty [38, 27, 24, 54, 55, 28, 61, 62, 57, 13].”
- Component selection and smoothing in smoothing spline analysis of variance models -- COSSO (2003, methodology): “Several new and effective methods for variable selection in linear models have been proposed in recent years [Breiman (1995); Tibshirani (1996); Frank and Friedman (1993); Fan and Li (2001)].”
- Envelopes and partial least squares regression (2013, background): “Frank and Friedman (1993) gave an informative discussion of PLS from various statistical views.”
- Variable Selection in Predictive Regressions (2013, unknown): “While PLS is designed to shrink away from the predictor space in the low variance directions, Frank and Friedman (1993) find that PLS routinely inflates the high variance directions.”
- Input-dependent estimation of generalization error under covariate shift (2005, background): “, learning with non-quadratic loss functions [16, 53, 49] or non-quadratic regularizers [10, 52, 48, 6].”
- Program evaluation with high-dimensional data (2013, methodology): “This efficient influence function was derived by Hahn (1998); it was also used by Cattaneo (2010) in the series context (with p n) and Rothe and Firpo (2013) in the kernel context.”
- Bridge regression: Adaptivity and group selection (2011, methodology): “1 Background Bridge regression is a broad class of the penalized regression method proposed by Frank and Friedman (1993). The bridge estimate can be obtained by minimizing”
- Asymptotic properties of bridge estimators in sparse high-dimensional regression models (2008, background): “For any given γ > 0, the value β̂n that minimizes (1) is called a bridge estimator [Frank and Friedman (1993) and Fu (1998)].”
- Big Data and Data Science Methods for Management Research (2016, methodology): “We refer to Frank and Friedman (1993) for a comparison of partial least squares and principal components regression.”
- High-Dimensional Methods and Inference on Structural and Treatment Effects (2013, methodology): “Usual choices of r are r = 2 which corresponds to the well-known ridge regression and r = 1 which corresponds to the LASSO estimator introduced by Tibshirani (1996) and Frank and Friedman (1993). When r > 1, the solution obtained by solving (1.4) has coefficients shrunk towards zero but does not set”
- A New Dimension Reduction Approach for Data-Rich Marketing Environments: Sliced Inverse Regression (2000, methodology): “In addition, Frank and Friedman (1993) found that VSS performs worse than PLSR or PCR.”
- Least angle and ℓ1 penalized regression: A review (2008, background): “A bridge regression (Frank and Friedman, 1993) ℓq norm penalty with 1 q 2 is strictly convex and has a grouping effect, but does not produce a sparse solution (Fan and Li, 2001).”