Learning functions across many orders of magnitudes
By Hado van Hasselt, Arthur Guez, Matteo Hessel, David Silver. 2016
17 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Sebastian Riedel
- Tom Hosking
- Ethan Perez
- Benigno Uria
- Jost Tobias Springenberg
- Jack W. Rae
- Mohit Bansal
- Charles Blundell
Citations in the corpus
- Red Teaming Language Models with Language Models (2022, methodology): “We use PopArt (van Hasselt et al., 2016) with a step size of 10−4 to account for variation in the value function scale during learning.”
- Learning values across many orders of magnitude (2016, methodology): “In the Atari domain several algorithmic variants and improvements for DQN have been proposed [van Hasselt et al., 2016, Bellemare et al., 2016, Schaul et al., 2016, Wang et al., 2016], as well as alternative solutions [Liang et al., 2016, Mnih et al., 2016].”
- Neural Episodic Control (2017, methodology): “A number of extensions have been proposed that improve DQN. Double DQN (Van Hasselt et al., 2016) reduces bias on the target calculation.”
- V-MPO: On-Policy Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimization for Discrete and Continuous Control (2019, methodology): “As we are interested in the multi-task setting where a single agent must learn a large number of tasks with differing reward scales, we used PopArt (van Hasselt et al., 2016; Hessel et al., 2018) for the value function, even when training on a single task.”
- Evaluating Rewards for Question Generation Models (2019, methodology): “All rewards were normalised with a simple form of PopArt (Hasselt et al., 2016), with the running mean µ R and standard deviation σ R updated on-line during training.”