Making Sense of the Voluntary Carbon Market: A Comparison of Carbon Offset Standards.

By A. Kollmuss, Helge Zink Tricorona, Clifford Polycarp. 2008

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53c38081504a1053bd0ed2616a0e01c0acbb6c43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Kariuki
2. Jessica F. Green
3. J. Lund
4. F. Sinclair
5. S. Chomba
6. V. G. Vyamana

Citations in the corpus

• Order out of Chaos: Public and Private Rules for Managing Carbon (2013, background): “The sources include: Abbott 2010; Bulkeley et al. 2012, Hale and Roger 2011; Hamilton et al. 2009; Kollmuss et al. 2008; www.ecolabelindex.org (last accessed June 27, 2011).”
• Roots of inequity: How the implementation of REDD+ reinforces past injustices (2016, background): “The two standards have comlementary requirements: VCS focuses on the rigor of carbon ccounting and CCBA on social and environment aspects associted with the development of the project (Kolmuss et al., 2008).”
• The Ethics of Carbon Neutrality: A Critical Examination of Voluntary Carbon Offset Providers (2011, unknown): “According to a comprehensive analysis conducted by Kollmuss et al. (2008), an inclusive, complete, and credible carbon offset standard must include the following three components: 1.”