Preventing Failures Due to Dataset Shift: Learning Predictive Models That Transport
By Adarsh Subbaswamy, Peter F. Schulam, Suchi Saria. 2018
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Representation & Self-Supervised Learning, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Francesco Locatello
- Anirudh Goyal
- Stefan Bauer
- Yoshua Bengio
- Nan Rosemary Ke
- Nal Kalchbrenner
- Andrej Risteski
In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
- Stefan Bauer
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Nan Rosemary Ke
- Pradeep Ravikumar
- Yoshua Bengio
- Anirudh Goyal
- Nal Kalchbrenner
- Marzyeh Ghassemi
Citations in the corpus
- Toward Causal Representation Learning (2021, background): “It also led to a range of follow-up work [32], [78], [97], [114], [115], [152], [153], [156], [167], [195], [204], [243], [263], [267], [277], [278], [281], complementing the studies of Bareinboim and Pearl [14], [185], and it inspired a thread of work in the statistics community exploiting…”
- Learning explanations that are hard to vary (2020, background): “Other works connecting causality and learning through invariances are (Subbaswamy et al., 2019; Heinze-Deml and Meinshausen, 2017), and perhaps – most related to our work – (Arjovsky et al.”
- Causality for Machine Learning (2019, background): “The line of work provided rather fruitful (Zhang et al., 2013; Weichwald et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Gong et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2017; Blöbaum et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019; Subbaswamy et al., 2018; Rabanser et al., 2018; Li et al., 2018a; Lipton et al., 2018; Li et al”
- Fairness Violations and Mitigation under Covariate Shift (2019, methodology): “When causal structure of the domains is known, recent work on causal domain adaptation [38, 61, 66, 68] identify predictors with stable accuracy under unseen changes in distribution.”
- Deep Structural Causal Models for Tractable Counterfactual Inference (2020, background): “By explicitly modelling causal relationships and acknowledging the difference between causation and correlation, causality becomes a natural field of study for improving the transparency, fairness, and robustness of DL-based systems [17, 18].”
- Algorithm fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare (2023, background): “…shifts, some guidelines have emphasized the importance of guaranteeing model stability to how the data were generated 118 , and the use of reactive or proactive approaches for intervening on temporal dataset shifts in early-warning systems such as those for the prediction of sepsis 117,184 .”
- Causality matters in medical imaging (2019, background): “Interestingly, the same formalism of causal reasoning explored here was also shown to be especially well-suited for expressing and addressing issues of unfairness (e.g. social biases) 62 and dataset shift 63 in other contexts.”
- Clinical artificial intelligence quality improvement: towards continual monitoring and updating of AI algorithms in healthcare (2022, background): “Model developers can also incorporate known sources of common-cause variation into the model to improve its generalizability 28,29 .”
- Feature Robustness in Non-stationary Health Records: Caveats to Deployable Model Performance in Common Clinical Machine Learning Tasks (2019, background): “Another approach estimates a relationship between source and target domains that incorporates prior knowledge of how the data generating process might differ (or stay the same) between domains (Subbaswamy et al., 2019).”
- Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare (2020, background): “A transport-able model can be integrated into clinical guidelines to augment healthcare with action-savvy predictions, in pursuit of better precision medicine.”
- The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimization (2020, background): “Various works on invariant prediction (Muandet et al., 2013; Ghassami et al., 2017; Heinze-Deml et al., 2018; Rojas-Carulla et al., 2018; Subbaswamy et al., 2019; Christiansen et al., 2020) consider regression in both the linear and non-linear setting, but they exclusively focus on learning with…”