Uncertainties in Finite-Fault Slip Inversions: To What Extent to Believe? (A Critical Review)

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impact of megathrust geometry on inversion of coseismic slip from geodetic data: Application to the 1960 Chile earthquake (2009, background): “It has been well recognized that inversion procedures may affect the slip distribution solution [Beresnev, 2003].”
A Kinematic Source Time Function Compatible With Earthquake Dynamics: Relations Between Kinematic and Dynamic Parameters (2004, background): “We start by pointing out that only a few parameters are usually retrieved through kinematic analyses of forward or inverse modeling of seismic waves (see Beresnev, 2003).”
Scaling relations of seismic moment, rupture area, average slip, and asperity size for M~9 subduction‐zone earthquakes (2013, methodology): “, Beresnev, 2003]. M08 derived scaling relations using 26 slip models of plate-boundary earthquakes following the procedure given by Somerville et al. [1999], in which the rupture area is trimmed to estimate fault size and the asperity regions are defined from the slip distribution.”