Spatiotemporal Distribution of Black Bear–Human Conflicts in Colorado, USA

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Shifting perceptions of risk and reward: Dynamic selection for human development by black bears in the western United States (2015, background): “…associated with human activity (Beckmann and Berger, 2003a; Nellemann et al., 2007 and Ordiz et al., 2011), human–bear conflicts have generally increased over time (Hristienko and McDonald, 2007), displaying high temporal and spatial variation (Baruch-Mordo et al., 2008 and Treves et al., 2010).”
Foraging ecology of black bears in urban environments: guidance for human‐bear conflict mitigation (2015, background): “1), an urban system that can experience high levels of human-bear conflicts (Baruch-Mordo et al. 2008).”
No single solution: application of behavioural principles in mitigating human–wildlife conflict (2016, background): “…on black bears, Ursus americanus, in urban environments clearly demonstrates that bears perceive people as a potential risk, but that failures in natural food resources prompt greater risk-taking behaviour in proximity to people (Baruch-Mordo et al., 2008; Johnson et al., 2015; Lewis et al., 2015).”
Food availability and foraging near human developments by black bears (2013, background): “Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 56:238–247.”