The effects of environmental fiscal reform in Germany: a simulation study

By Stefan Bach, M. Kohlhaas, B. Meyer, B. Praetorius, H. Welsch. 2002

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5396d3ead94801072cbd7906bfa9fcddf5fcc942

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Nicholas Bardsley
2. M. Büchs
3. S. Duwe
4. Simonetta Longhi

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Nicholas Bardsley
2. P. Moffatt
3. Rupert Sausgruber

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Nicholas Bardsley
2. M. Büchs
3. S. Duwe
4. Simonetta Longhi

Citations in the corpus

• Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies (2011, background): “A study on the German ‘eco tax’ demonstrated that the reduction of the contribution to pension insurance actually increased the regressive effect as the reduction mainly benefited middle income households but disadvantaged low income, unemployed and pensioner households (Bach et al., 2002; Bork, 200”
• Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective (2007, unknown): “Bach et al. (2002), using the models PANTHA RHEI and LEAN, find that the modest ecological tax reform enacted in Germany in 1999–2003 increased employment by 0.”