Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make it Right

By J. Dwyer, Peter J. Neufeld, Barry C. Scheck. 2000

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5385fd12c24c7a1a3abed60b03c76a7dea76d0ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Mitchell B. Chamlin
2. John K. Cochran
3. Samuel R. Gross
4. James D. Unnever

Citations in the corpus

• Can information change public opinion? Another test of the Marshall hypotheses (2005, background): “…all capital cases nationwide between 1973 and 1995 were contaminated by serious, reversible errors (Liebman, Fagan, & West, 2000) and the study by Scheck, Nuefeld, and Dwyer (2001) of the Innocence Project documenting numerous exoneration of wrongfully convicted criminals, (h) the U.S. Supreme…”
• Convicting the Innocent (2008, background): “All of these factors are common among cases of known exonerations (Westervelt & Humphrey 2002; Scheck et al. 2003; Innocence Project 2008b).”