Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis. Part 1: Linear systems
By Fred van Keulen, Raphael T. Haftka, Nam-Ho Kim. 2005
351 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/537b3e60874268185ecbc9173979c996cb753a6f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Ole Sigmund
- Matthijs Langelaar
- Martin P. Bendsøe
- Anton Evgrafov
- A. Gersborg-Hansen
- John T. Hwang
- Joaquim R. Martins
- Kurt Maute
In Statistics and Probability
- Joaquim R. Martins
- Andrew B. Lambe
- John T. Hwang
- Martin P. Bendsøe
- Anton Evgrafov
- Mostafa Abdalla
- Philip S. Beran
- Dang-Manh Nguyen
Citations in the corpus
- Topology optimization of heat conduction problems using the finite volume method (2006, background): “The complex variable trick is typically not applied in structural optimization problems but is a strong and valuable tool, cf., Squire and Trapp (1998) (see also van Keulen et al. 2005 ).”
- Analytical Sensitivity Analysis of an Unsteady Vortex Lattice Method for Flapping Wing Optimization (2009, background): “Many techniques for computing these design derivatives exist [20], though the current discussion is concerned only with analytical methods: direct and adjoint.”
- Isogeometric design of elastic arches for maximum fundamental frequency (2011, background): “Moreover the inherent geometric error is likely to result in inconsistent design sensitivities ( van Keulen et al. 2005 ).”
- Review and Unification of Methods for Computing Derivatives of Multidisciplinary Computational Models (2013, background): “In such cases, using a large enough step can effectively smooth the derivative and capture the correct trend in the function of interest [95].”
- Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures (2013, methodology): “If the analysis codes require a particularly long time to evaluate, automatic differentiation or analytic derivative calculations (direct or adjoint methods) can be used to avoidmultiple discipline-analysis evaluations [94–98].”
- Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learning (2020, background): “[104] F Van Keulen, RT Haftka, and NH Kim.”
- On the sensitivities of multiple eigenvalues (2011, methodology): “For alternative approaches to the problem we refer to the two review papers ( van Keulen et al.2005; Seyranian et al. 1994) and references therein.”
- Design sensitivity and Hessian matrix of generalized eigenproblems (2014, neutral): “(For details, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] or [6].”
- An additive manufacturing filter for topology optimization of print-ready designs (2016, background): “Note the resemblance to adjoint sensitivity analysis of transient problems (Van Keulen et al. 2005), caused by the layerwise, sequential nature of the AM filter.”