Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking

By Sid Kouider, Stanislas Dehaene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007

775 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/533b0ccbe615ddb25e99c20f467fdab33cc41140

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. H. Berlin
2. Bernard J. Baars
3. Christof Koch
4. Adriaan Spruyt
5. J. de Houwer
6. Stanislas Dehaene
7. Liad Mudrik
8. Nathan Faivre

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. H. Berlin
2. Christof Koch
3. Dirk Hermans
4. Stanislas Dehaene
5. Gerald M. Edelman
6. Bernard J. Baars
7. J. de Houwer
8. Leonardo G. Cohen

Citations in the corpus

• Modulation of automatic semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation (2009, background): “More recently, it has also been argued that the semantic priming effect depends on temporal and spatial attention (Kouider & Dehaene, 2007).”
• The Neural Basis of the Dynamic Unconscious (2011, methodology): “And although the existence of nonconscious computations at higher levels (e.g., semantic or inferential processing) has been controversial (Dixon, 1971; Eriksen, 1960; Greenwald, 1992; Holender, 1986), a range of empirical find1 The terms consciousness and awareness (or conscious and aware) are used”
• Toward a computational theory of conscious processing (2013, neutral): “Using masking [5], crowding [6], inattention [7] or binocular rivalry [8], images can be presented under conditions such that they remain strictly invisible.”
• Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception. (2014, neutral): “…threshold, such that they are never consciously aware of these stimuli, the semantic content or emotional meaning of these subliminal stimuli do nevertheless significantly influence their perceptual experience of a subsequent stimulus that is consciously perceived (e.g. Kouider & Dehaene, 2007).”
• Multisensory Integration in Complete Unawareness (2014, background): “…is commonly found in the field of unconscious cognition, we should note that congruency effects were found only for reaction times (and not for response biases or accuracies), probably because unconscious stimuli have a weak impact on overt responses (see Kouider & Dehaene, 2007, for a review).”
• Biology of Consciousness (2010, background): “While certain discriminations may arise unconsciously (Kouider and Dehaene, 2007), they would not, in general, be able to contribute to the planning under novel conditions that incorporates the myriad distinctions made possible by the Dynamic Core and Global Workspace.”
• How “semantic” is response priming restricted to practiced items? A reply to Abrams & Grinspan (2007)☆ (2007, neutral): “This demonstration adds to the growing body of work that provides evidence for the genuine existence of subliminal influences (see Kouider & Dehaene, 2007 for a review).”
• Conscious and Nonconscious Processes:Distinct Forms of Evidence Accumulation? (2011, background): “Here I present only a brief overview of this line of research (for a broader review, see Kouider and Dehaene 2007).”