Species Richness and Patterns of Invasion in Plants, Birds, and Fishes in the United States*
By Thomas J. Stohlgren, D. Barnett, C. Flather, P. Fuller, B. Peterjohn, John Kartesz, L. Master. Biological Invasions, 2006
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/533454a05dd645534673edf6bc65c5a4c114a2de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Gentile Francesco Ficetola
- Thomas J. Stohlgren
- Wilfried Thuiller
- C. Miaud
- Sunil Kumar
- D. Sax
- B. von Holle
- David Tilman
In Ecology
- Thomas J. Stohlgren
- Gentile Francesco Ficetola
- JJ Stachowicz
- D. Sax
- J. Fridley
- C. Miaud
- J. Tella
- Sunil Kumar
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Thomas J. Stohlgren
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- J. Fridley
- Gentile Francesco Ficetola
- JJ Stachowicz
- Sunil Kumar
- D. Sax
Citations in the corpus
- Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species — the American bullfrog (2007, background): “…probability of invasion of species rich communities is frequently expected, yet the presence of extrinsic factors influencing both native and non-native species can masque this relationship and cause the non-detection of such a pattern (Shea & Chesson, 2002; but see also Stohlgren et al., 2006).”
- Plant species invasions along the latitudinal gradient in the United States (2006, methodology): “We tested only two models on a preliminary set of data (Stohlgren et al. 2005), so we updated the data set and expanded the analysis to an a priori suite of models designed to test our primary hypothesis that biotic variables would better describe patterns of native and nonnative species densities…”
- Potential habitat distribution for the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US (2009, background): “nvironmental change in North America has reinforced the importance of habitat modeling, to determine the habitat preferences and potential geographic distributions of invasive species in terrestrial (Stohlgren et al. 2006) and aquatic (Williamson et al. 2008) systems.”
- The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change (2008, background): “Multispecies approaches to monitoring invasive species and pathogens The numbers of non-indigenous species of plants, birds, and fishes vary predictably across the US, according to native species richness and human population density (Stohlgren et al. 2006).”
- The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. (2007, background): “The reporting of native–exotic richness patterns from a variety of ecosystems is growing (e.g., Stohlgren et al. 1999, 2003, 2006a, Brown and Peet 2003, Cleland et al. 2004, Gilbert and Lechowicz 2005), but is also controversial (Rejmanek 2003, Taylor and Irwin 2004).”
- Invasive Alien Species in an Era of Globalization (2007, unknown): “in press b), and others have been used to make predictions about the relationships between non-native and native species richness and human facilitation of invasives (Stohlgren et al. 2006).”
- Dealing with non-native species: what makes the difference in South America? (2012, background): “2007; Sax 2002; Speziale and Ezcurra 2011), and people tend to settle in rich areas facilitating the establishment of introduced species (Stohlgren et al. 2006).”
- Chinook salmon invade southern South America (2008, background): “Stohlgren et al. 2006) however forecasting invasions remains problematic.”