Unsupervised state representation learning with robotic priors: a robustness benchmark

By Timothée Lesort, Mathieu Seurin, Xinrui Li, Natalia Díaz Rodríguez, David Filliat. 2017

33 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Our understanding of the world depends highly on our capacity to produce intuitive and simplified representations which can be easily used to solve problems. We reproduce this simplification process using a neural network to build a low dimensional state representation of the world from images acquired by a robot. As in Jonschkowski et al. 2015, we learn in an unsupervised way using prior knowledge about the world as loss functions called robotic priors and extend this approach to high dimension richer images to learn a 3D representation of the hand position of a robot from RGB images. We propose a quantitative evaluation of the learned representation using nearest neighbors in the state space that allows to assess its quality and show both the potential and limitations of robotic priors in realistic environments. We augment image size, add distractors and domain randomization, all crucial components to achieve transfer learning to real robots. Finally, we also contribute a new prior to improve the robustness of the representation. The applications of such low dimensional state representation range from easing reinforcement learning (RL) and knowledge transfer across tasks, to facilitating learning from raw data with more efficient and compact high level representations. The results show that the robotic prior approach is able to extract high level representation as the 3D position of an arm and organize it into a compact and coherent space of states in a challenging dataset.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Control and Systems Engineering, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning, Robotics & Control

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Chelsea Finn
  3. Natalia Díaz Rodríguez
  4. David Filliat
  5. Pierre Sermanet
  6. Timothée Lesort
  7. Pieter Abbeel
  8. Corey Lynch

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Chelsea Finn
  2. Timothée Lesort
  3. David Filliat
  4. Natalia Díaz Rodríguez
  5. Tianhe Yu
  6. Dorsa Sadigh
  7. Debidatta Dwibedi
  8. Jonathan Tompson

In Control and Systems Engineering

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Pierre Sermanet
  3. Corey Lynch
  4. Jonathan Tompson
  5. Chelsea Finn
  6. Tianhe Yu
  7. Dorsa Sadigh
  8. Ashley D. Edwards

In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

  1. Natalia Díaz Rodríguez
  2. Sergey Levine
  3. David Filliat
  4. Timothée Lesort
  5. Tianhe Yu
  6. Pierre Sermanet
  7. Chelsea Finn
  8. Jonathan Tompson

In Robotics & Control

  1. Pierre Sermanet
  2. Corey Lynch
  3. Chelsea Finn
  4. Tianhe Yu
  5. Natalia Díaz Rodríguez
  6. Sergey Levine
  7. David Filliat
  8. Timothée Lesort

Citations in the corpus