Do People Vote with Their Feet? An Empirical Test of Tiebout's Mechanism

By H. S. Banzhaf, Randall Walsh. 2008

679 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/532fe10f139737e872ec454d8f70a01530b0c740

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Who Benefits from Environmental Regulation? Evidence from the Clean Air Act Amendments (2015, methodology): “For example, Bayer et al. (2009) find a MWTP of $149 ($1982-84) using decennial census data and an IV strategy based on long-range pollution transport.”
The Limits of Limited Liability: Evidence from Industrial Pollution (2020, neutral): “…and Hamilton (1996) argue violations are concentrated in facilities that release a small amount of toxins, suggesting misreporting 7For example, see Banzhaf and Walsh (2008), Bui and Mayer (2003), Currie and Schmieder (2009), Currie (2011), Greenstone (2003), Hamilton (1995), and Konar and Cohen…”
Air pollution and defensive expenditures: Evidence from particulate-filtering facemasks (2017, background): “In the long run, urban residents can sort into places with better air quality, taking into account a large array of location attributes and individual preferences (Banzhaf and Walsh, 2008).”
Can the land tax help curb urban sprawl? Evidence from growth patterns in Pennsylvania (2010, neutral): “…have increasingly experimented with these solutions, trying transferable development right programs in states like Maryland (McConnell et al., 2006; McConnell and Walls, 2009) and placing measures to publicly purchase open space on local ballots (Kotchen and Powers, 2006; Banzhaf et al., 2008).”
Hazardous Waste Cleanup, Neighborhood Gentrification, and Environmental Justice: Evidence from Restricted Access Census Block Data (2011, background): “These results would provide a direct test of the predictions about race and income described in Banzhaf and Walsh (2008). share of occupied units increases by 1.2 and 1.1 percentage points with each treatment.”
Do 'Capitalization Effects' for Public Goods Reveal the Public's Willingness to Pay? (2014, neutral): “For example, Banzhaf and Walsh (2013) use a Oaxaca decomposition to characterize conflation bias in differences-in-differences estimates for the effect of changes in public goods on the racial composition of neighborhoods.”
Every Breath You Take—Every Dollar You’ll Make: The Long-Term Consequences of the Clean Air Act of 1970 (2017, neutral): “If these increases in housing values reflect that higher socio-economic status families are migrating to counties with cleaner air (Banzhaf and Walsh, 2008), then we may observe changes in the underlying population characteristics of nonattainment counties post-CAAA.”
Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities (2010, background): “08) [4] Wake calibration Diewert Spatial No Average 9Sj9 1.”
The Effect of Power Plants on Local Housing Values and Rents (2011, background): “…2008), waste incinerators (Kiel & McClain, 1995), nuclear power plants (Nelson, 1981; Gamble & Downing, 1982), coal-burning power plants (Blomquist, 1974), and facilities that report to the Toxic Release Inventory (Bui & Mayer, 2003; Oberholzer-Gee & Mitsunari, 2006; Banzhaf & Walsh, 2008).”
The Impact of Pollution on Worker Productivity (2012, neutral): “Since pollution is capitalized into housing prices (Chay and Greenstone 2005), individuals may sort into areas with better air quality depending, in part, on their income, which is a function of their productivity (Banzhaf and Walsh 2008).”