Logical dialogue-games and fallacies
By Douglas Walton. 1984
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Tim Miller
- Douglas Walton
- Kacper Sokol
- Giulia Vilone
- Q. Liao
- Abdallah Arioua
- Shane T. Mueller
- Prashan Madumal
Citations in the corpus
- Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences (2017, background): “tions as to when and how an explainer should transfer knowledge to an explainee. In a follow-on paper, Walton [137] proposes a formal dialogue model called CE, based on an earlier persuasion dialogue [139], which denes the conditions on how a dialogue commences, rules for governing the locutions in ”
- The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof (2007, unknown): “They serve different purposes and can be used together.”
- Dialogical Models of Explanation (2007, background): “Four principal formal systems of dialogue were constructed in (Walton, 1984) as structures to model persuasion dialogues in which one party has a designated thesis to be proven and tries to use rational argumentation based on the other party’s commitments to try to get him to come to accept this…”