The Economic Costs to International Labor Restrictions: Revisiting the Empirical Discussion

By J. Moses, Bjørn Letnes. 2004

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53222ea6e5396be176382aee747ae98e80754db2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. F. Toubal
2. P. Klein
3. Gabriel Felbermayr
4. B. Jung
5. Gustavo Ventura
6. Peter H. Egger
7. A. Lassmann
8. Xuepeng Liu

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Klein
2. Gabriel Felbermayr
3. B. Jung
4. F. Toubal
5. Gustavo Ventura

Citations in the corpus

• Productivity differences and the dynamic effects of labor movements (2009, background): “Examples include Borjas (1995) and Hamilton and Whalley (1984), and more recently Moses and Letnes (2004) and Walmsley and Winters (2003), who provide quantitative estimates of the effects of immigration and labor mobility in static frameworks.”
• Ethnic Networks, Information, and International Trade: Revisiting the Evidence (2009, background): “Simple static and dynamic neoclassical models predict that more liberal international mobility of labor has the potential to unlock huge efficiency gains; see Moses and Letnes (2004) or Klein and Ventura (2007). These effects derive from a more efficient allocation of the global work force over coun”
• Economics and Emigration: Trillion-Dollar Bills on the Sidewalk? (2011, unknown): “When it comes”