STAR: Sparse Trained Articulated Human Body Regressor

By Ahmed A. A. Osman, Timo Bolkart, Michael J. Black. European Conference on Computer Vision, 2020

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The SMPL body model is widely used for the estimation, synthesis, and analysis of 3D human pose and shape. While popular, we show that SMPL has several limitations and introduce STAR, which is quantitatively and qualitatively superior to SMPL. First, SMPL has a huge number of parameters resulting from its use of global blend shapes. These dense pose-corrective offsets relate every vertex on the mesh to all the joints in the kinematic tree, capturing spurious long-range correlations. To address this, we define per-joint pose correctives and learn the subset of mesh vertices that are influenced by each joint movement. This sparse formulation results in more realistic deformations and significantly reduces the number of model parameters to 20% of SMPL. When trained on the same data as SMPL, STAR generalizes better despite having many fewer parameters. Second, SMPL factors pose-dependent deformations from body shape while, in reality, people with different shapes deform differently. Consequently, we learn shape-dependent pose-corrective blend shapes that depend on both body pose and BMI. Third, we show that the shape space of SMPL is not rich enough to capture the variation in the human population. We address this by training STAR with an additional 10,000 scans of male and female subjects, and show that this results in better model generalization. STAR is compact, generalizes better to new bodies and is a drop-in replacement for SMPL. STAR is publicly available for research purposes at this http URL.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Control and Systems Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/531e91dee7a483c0a7d033a3606a594b6b23da13

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Kevin Qinghong Lin
  2. Lijuan Wang
  3. Zicheng Liu
  4. Taojiannan Yang
  5. Ju Shen
  6. Mubarak Shah
  7. Ruixu Liu
  8. Ce Zheng

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Zicheng Liu
  2. Lijuan Wang
  3. Luc Van Gool
  4. Nasser Kehtarnavaz
  5. Kevin Qinghong Lin
  6. Jitendra Malik
  7. Dacheng Tao
  8. Cordelia Schmid

In Control and Systems Engineering

  1. Taojiannan Yang
  2. Ju Shen
  3. Kevin Qinghong Lin
  4. Mubarak Shah
  5. Ruixu Liu
  6. Ce Zheng
  7. Chen Chen
  8. Wenhan Wu

Citations in the corpus