Buckling of stainless steel square hollow section compression members

By Y. Liu, B. Young. 2003

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The continuous strength method for structural stainless steel design (2013, background): “(17) and (18) for major axis and minor axis bending, respectively, where Wpl is the plastic section modulus, Wel is the elastic section modulus and α is 2.0 for SHS/RHS and 1.2 for I-sections.”
Description of stress-strain curves for stainless steel alloys (2015, unknown): “…RD T 1.2-4.8 Uy et al. (2011) 1.4301 3 Cold- formed RD T 5 Han et al. (2013) 1.4401 6 Cold- formed RD T 2-3 Theofanous et al. (2009) 1.4301 2 Cold- formed RD T 2 Liu and Young (2003) Ferritic 1.4003 18 Cold- formed RD, TD, 45 T, C 1-2 Becque and Rasmussen (2009a) 404 6 Cold- formed RD, TD, 45…”
Comparative experimental study of hot-rolled and cold-formed rectangular hollow sections (2010, background): “Direct comparisons between hot-rolled and cold-formed structural steel sections are relatively scarce, but many of the above properties have been studied in hot-rolled steel sections [5-7], cold-formed steel sections [8-11] and cold-formed stainless steel sections [12-15].”
Testing and numerical modelling of lean duplex stainless steel hollow section columns (2009, background): “20 have been reported in [12, 44-49], whereas the flexural buckling data were taken from [45-48, 50, 51].”