Quantitative comparison of classification capability: fully polarimetric versus dual and single-polarization SAR
By Jong-Sen Lee, Mitchell R. Grunes, Eric Pottier. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001
367 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/530cd185a22917a8ec3867e3254a08ab02363902
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
In Environmental Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Unsupervised terrain classification preserving polarimetric scattering characteristics (2004, background): “L-band has been found to be the desirable radar frequency for general terrain and land-use classification [21].”
- ASSESSMENT OF L-BAND SAR DATA AT DIFFERENT POLARIZATION COMBINATIONS FOR CROP AND OTHER LANDUSE CLASSIFICATION (2012, result): “This is in agreement with the results published earlier by various authors [13, 26].”
- A review of polarimetry in the context of synthetic aperture radar: concepts and information extraction (2004, methodology): “…(Kong et al., 1987; Lim et al., 1989; Kong, 1990; Van Zyl, 1989; 1992; Rignot et al., 1992; Touzi et al., 1992a; Pottier and Cloude, 1995; Cloude and Pottier, 1997a; Freeman and Durden, 1998; Lee et al., 1999a; 2001; Lombardo and Oliver, 2002; Pottier and Lee, 1999; Ferro-Famil et al., 2001).”