On the Long-Run Volatility of Stocks
By Carlos M. Carvalho, Hedibert Freitas Lopes, Robert E. McCulloch. 2018
18 citations recorded by the source corpus.
ABSTRACT In this article, we investigate whether or not the volatility per period of stocks is lower over longer horizons. Taking the perspective of an investor, we evaluate the predictive variance of k-period returns under different model and prior specifications. We adopt the state-space framework of Pástor and Stambaugh to model the dynamics of expected returns and evaluate the effects of prior elicitation in the resulting volatility estimates. Part of the developments includes an extension that incorporates time-varying volatilities and covariances in a constrained prior information set-up. Our conclusion for the U.S. market, under plausible prior specifications, is that stocks are less volatile in the long run. Model assessment exercises demonstrate the models and priors supporting our main conclusions are in accordance with the data. To assess the generality of the results, we extend our analysis to a number of international equity indices. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
- Nicholas G. Polson
- Guanhao Feng
- Jingyu He
- Markus Pelger
- Jun Yu
- Tim Bollerslev
- N. Shephard
- Mikhail Chernov
Citations in the corpus
- Deep Learning for Predicting Asset Returns (2018, methodology): “(1976) and Fama and French (1993). Crosssectional time series predictability is studied using predictive regressions, see Kandel and Stambaugh (1996), Barberis (2000) and Welch and Goyal (2008).”