3D Printing for the Rapid Prototyping of Structural Electronics
By Eric MacDonald, Rudy Salas, David Espalin, Mireya A. Perez, E. Aguilera, D. Muse, Ryan B. Wicker. IEEE Access, 2014
547 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In new product development, time to market (TTM) is critical for the success and profitability of next generation products. When these products include sophisticated electronics encased in 3D packaging with complex geometries and intricate detail, TTM can be compromised - resulting in lost opportunity. The use of advanced 3D printing technology enhanced with component placement and electrical interconnect deposition can provide electronic prototypes that now can be rapidly fabricated in comparable time frames as traditional 2D bread-boarded prototypes; however, these 3D prototypes include the advantage of being embedded within more appropriate shapes in order to authentically prototype products earlier in the development cycle. The fabrication freedom offered by 3D printing techniques, such as stereolithography and fused deposition modeling have recently been explored in the context of 3D electronics integration - referred to as 3D structural electronics or 3D printed electronics. Enhanced 3D printing may eventually be employed to manufacture end-use parts and thus offer unit-level customization with local manufacturing; however, until the materials and dimensional accuracies improve (an eventuality), 3D printing technologies can be employed to reduce development times by providing advanced geometrically appropriate electronic prototypes. This paper describes the development process used to design a novelty six-sided gaming die. The die includes a microprocessor and accelerometer, which together detect motion and upon halting, identify the top surface through gravity and illuminate light-emitting diodes for a striking effect. By applying 3D printing of structural electronics to expedite prototyping, the development cycle was reduced from weeks to hours.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53072de6a954a6efb1bf7ea9bb05fa5de16781ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- J. Gardan
- Eric MacDonald
- Ryan B. Wicker
- Amir Abbas Zadpoor
- Rigoberto C. Advincula
- Qiyi Chen
- Gerwin Smit
- J. Dizon
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
In Human-Computer Interaction
Citations in the corpus
- Soft Robots Manufacturing: A Review (2018, unknown): “This allows for instance to include electro-conductive materials in a mechanical structure in order to produce parts with potentially complex shapes that include 2D or 3D electrical circuits (Macdonald et al., 2014; Goh et al., 2017).”
- A review of the fatigue behavior of 3D printed polymers (2019, background): “As a result of these improvements in AM, various industries such as biomedical [3–10], aerospace [11], apparel [12,13], dentistry [14], automotive [15], electronics [2,16], and oceanography [17] are researching this technique to produce parts.”
- Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers (2018, background): “AM is now being seriously considered to produce mateials for several applications, namely, construction [14,15], apparel 16–18], denstistry [19,8,13] medicine [20–29], electronics [10,30], utomotive [8,31–33], robots [31], military [34–37], oceanograhy [38], aerospace [39,40,11,41,8], and others.”
- Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality (2016, background): “Other sensors such as cameras, infrared LEDs (47), accelerometers (7), pressure sensors, dust sensors, and bioelectrical sensors (48) have been inserted directly into designated cavities during fabrication.”
- Design for Additive Manufacturing (2019, methodology): “In addition, electrical components [146][193][195][253] (Fig.”
- Smart materials in additive manufacturing: state of the art and trends (2018, methodology): “3D printing electronic devices is possible when the 3D shape can be represented as a flat 2D surface (Macdonald et al. 2014).”