Estimating R 2 Shrinkage in Multiple Regression: A Comparison of Different Analytical Methods

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Improved Shrinkage Estimation of Squared Multiple Correlation Coefficient and Squared Cross-Validity Coefficient (2008, methodology): “Therefore, the estimators considered in Raju et al. (1999) and Yin and Fan (2001) are only subsets of these formulas (a total of 18) presented here.”
Lie Detection from Multiple Cues: A Meta‐analysis (2014, methodology): “With the Browne-1 formula in Yin and Fan (2001, pp. 210, 215), we compute where N is the number of lie and truth tellers and p is the number of cues from which deception is predicted and T = 1 – (1 (cid:2) R 2 )[( N (cid:2) 1)/( N (cid:2) p (cid:2) 1)] We also report results on percentage lie –…”
Effect-Size Measures and Meta-Analytic Thinking in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, methodology): “…effect) for main effects and interactions; Cohen’s d or Glass’s delta for post hoc mean comparisons Regression R2 or corrected R2 (for R2 corrections, see Yin & Fan, 2001) Hotelling’s T 2 D2 (Mahalanobis distance) MANOVA Multivariate η2 (1 – Wilks’s lambda); D2 for multivariate mean (MANCOVA)…”