Theory of Porous Media: Highlights in Historical Development and Current State

By R. Boer, N. Katsube. 2000

310 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52e81f01c1c12c8be2758b65aed7f55cc32b6176

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. E. Arruda
2. Karl Grosh
3. Shiva P. Pudasaini

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Olaf Kolditz
2. Wenqing Wang
3. Shiva P. Pudasaini

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Shiva P. Pudasaini

Citations in the corpus

• Object‐oriented finite element analysis of thermo‐hydro‐mechanical (THM) problems in porous media (2007, background): “The coding of the element neighbouring process is given below: neighbours[0] = (CElem*) Neighbour1; neighbours[1] = (CElem*) Neighbour2; neighbours[2] = (CElem*) Neighbour3; neighbours[3] = (CElem*) Face4; Face4->position = ‘B’; // on domain boundary Face4->owner = this; // this element The above ne”
• A continuum treatment of growth in biological tissue: the coupling of mass transport and mechanics (2003, background): “An alternative is to apply the theory of porous media that grew out of the classical work of Fick and Darcy in the 1800s (Terzaghi, 1943; de Boer, 2000).”
• Modelling debris flows down general channels (2005, background): “This division is the weakness of this formulation, because it is ad-hoc, but the introduced split is a common assumption in soil physics where the normal fluid-pressure, p, is divided among the constituents according to some proportion, (see, Iverson and Denlinger, 2001; De Boer, 2000; Ehlers et al.”