A Comparison of Methods to Detect Publication Bias for Meta-analysis of Continuous Data

By N. Idris. 2012

47 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52dfb0783446b51085b554dee62a4d9cc7a23b11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. Carlijn J M Wibbelink
2. M. Assink

Citations in the corpus

• Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial (2016, methodology): “…ongoing debate on the appropriateness of the available methods and each method seems to have its own limitations (see, for instance, Egger, Davey-Smith, & Altman, 2001; Nakagawa & Santos, 2012; Nik Idris, 2012; Peters, Sutton, Jones, Abrams, & Rushton, 2007; Ter-rin, Schmid, Lau, & Olkin, 2003).”