MIDA: Multiple Imputation Using Denoising Autoencoders
By Lovedeep Gondara, Ke Wang. 2017
289 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Junier B. Oliva
- Lei Xu
- Vadim Borisov
- Gjergji Kasneci
- Kalyan Veeramachaneni
- Tobias Leemann
- Kathrin Sessler
- Shoaib Akbar
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Vadim Borisov
- Gjergji Kasneci
- Tobias Leemann
- Kathrin Sessler
- Martin Pawelczyk
- Junier B. Oliva
- Lei Xu
- Bilal Mirza
Citations in the corpus
- Synthesizing Tabular Data using Generative Adversarial Networks (2018, methodology): “Besides statistical models generating fully synthetic data, neural models are used to impute missing values in datasets; for example, Gondara and Wang [15] uses deep de-noising autoencoders, and Yoon et al. [49] use GAN.”
- Machine Learning and Integrative Analysis of Biomedical Big Data (2019, methodology): “In addition, a denoising autoencoder (DAE)-based MI (MIDA) was also proposed very recently [130].”
- Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey (2021, background): “Three of the main purposes are data augmentation [117], data imputation (i.e., the filling of missing values) [118], [119], and rebalancing [36], [37], [120], [121].”
- Flow Models for Arbitrary Conditional Likelihoods (2019, methodology): “eral real-valued data and images (for inpainting). Classic methods for imputation include k-nearest neighbors (Troyanskaya et al. 2001), random forest (Stekhoven and B¨uhlmann 2011) and auto-encoder (Gondara and Wang 2018) approaches. Often, these methods infer just one single prediction for each mi”