Chapter 3.10 – A progressive quadratic failure criterion for a laminate*

By Kuo-Shih Liu, S. Tsai. 2004

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Finite element analysis of burst pressure of composite hydrogen storage vessels (2009, methodology): “Based on the work of Liu and Tsai, Naik and Krishna Murty [14] proposed an appropriate failure-mechanism method in which ights reserved. different failure criteria are adopted depending on the stress state.”
Micromechanical analysis of polymer composites reinforced by unidirectional fibres: Part I – Constitutive modelling (2013, background): “Puck and Schürmann (1998), Zinoviev et al. (1998), and Liu and Tsai (1998) were considered the most recommendable criteria.”
Composite materials non-linear modelling for long fibre-reinforced laminates (2008, background): “The lamination sequence obliges us to consider the behaviour of each lamina separately [3], and even the modelling of a single lamina appears to be a complex task since phenomena like fracture, fibre–matrix debonding, micro-buckling and large deformations have to be considered together with their mu”
Failure Models and Criteria for Frp Under In-Plane or Three-Dimensional Stress States Including Shear Non-Linearity (2013, methodology): “Despite several efforts to develop sound phenomenological criteria, non-phenomenological criteria like Tsai-Wu [25] are often better prediction tools than some phenomenological criteria [24].”