Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production

By S. Mitchell, M. Harmon, Kari O’Connell. 2012

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomedical Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52a94edf765674ee4c4d7331aa826ad665249178

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

1. M. Junginger
2. Jan Gerrit Geurt Jonker
3. N. Bentsen
4. André P. C. Faaij

In Biomedical Engineering

1. M. Junginger
2. André P. C. Faaij
3. Jan Gerrit Geurt Jonker

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Junginger
2. Jan Gerrit Geurt Jonker
3. André P. C. Faaij

Citations in the corpus

• Carbon payback period and carbon offset parity point of wood pellet production in the South‐eastern United States (2014, methodology): “Mitchell et al. (2012) provides a conceptual explanation on the difference between carbon payback and carbon parity point.”
• Carbon Debt Payback Time for a Biomass Fired CHP Plant—A Case Study from Northern Europe (2018, background): “In contrast to assumptions applied by a number of other studies [6,7,22], the biomass scenario shows slightly higher fuel efficiency than the reference scenario, 85.”