Early Life Programming and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

By T. Bale, Tallie Z. Baram, Alan S. Brown, J. Goldstein, Thomas R. Insel, Mark I. McCarthy, C. Nemeroff, T. Reyes, R. Simerly, E. Susser and 1 more. Biological Psychiatry, 2010

936 citations recorded by the source corpus.

For more than a century, clinical investigators have focused on early life as a source of adult psychopathology. Early theories about psychic conflict and toxic parenting have been replaced by more recent formulations of complex interactions of genes and environment. Although the hypothesized mechanisms have evolved, a central notion remains: early life is a period of unique sensitivity during which experience confers enduring effects. The mechanisms for these effects remain almost as much a mystery today as they were a century ago. Recent studies suggest that maternal diet can program offspring growth and metabolic pathways, altering lifelong susceptibility to diabetes and obesity. If maternal psychosocial experience has similar programming effects on the developing offspring, one might expect a comparable contribution to neurodevelopmental disorders, including affective disorders, schizophrenia, autism, and eating disorders. Due to their early onset, prevalence, and chronicity, some of these disorders, such as depression and schizophrenia, are among the highest causes of disability worldwide according to the World Health Organization 2002 report. Consideration of the early life programming and transcriptional regulation in adult exposures supports a critical need to understand epigenetic mechanisms as a critical determinant in disease predisposition. Incorporating the latest insight gained from clinical and epidemiological studies with potential epigenetic mechanisms from basic research, the following review summarizes findings from a workshop on Early Life Programming and Neurodevelopmental Disorders held at the University of Pennsylvania in 2009.

Subfields: Behavioral Neuroscience, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52989062e5f0493bd5554aaac9ce644a13ffe709

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Behavioral Neuroscience

  1. C. Nemeroff
  2. B. V. D. Van den Bergh

In Education

  1. C. Nemeroff

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

  1. C. Nemeroff
  2. Tessa J. Roseboom
  3. B. V. D. Van den Bergh
  4. M. Weinstock

Citations in the corpus