Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation

By Halit Yanīkkaya. 2003

556 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5242fdca9a7d24edc0a1bd6b28b11f013f022e7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Export Performance and its Determinants: Supply and Demand Constraints (2008, background): “1 See Harrison (1996) for a review, Yanikkaya (2003) for a comprehensive review and set of estimates and Rodriguez”
The asymmetric effect of trade openness on economic growth in South Africa: a nonlinear ARDL approach (2020, background): “Another study that finds no significant growth effect of openness across countries includes Yanikkaya (2003).”
Tariffs and Growth: An Empirical Exploration of Contingent Relationships (2006, background): “4 In an apparent exception to this statement, Yanikkaya (2003) estimates a positive and statistically significant relationship between tariffs and growth using OLS estimation techniques, and claims this pattern to be particularly distinct among developing economies.”
Impact of Trade Openness and Human Capital on Economic Growth: A Comparative Investigation of Asian Countries (2020, background): “In another remarkable study in 100 developed and underdeveloped countries, Yanikkaya [34] confirmed a significant and positive relationship among trade openness and economic growth of underdeveloped countries by using fixed effect estimation.”
Governance and foreign direct investment links: evidence from panel data estimations (2007, background): “Openness to trade can attract foreign investors as it allows producers to access bigger markets, encourages the development of research and development and provides access to investment and intermediate goods (Yanikkaya, 2003).”