The SN 1006 Remnant: Optical Proper Motions, Deep Imaging, Distance, and Brightness at Maximum

By P. F. Winkler, Gaurav Gupta, K. Long. 2002

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We report the first measurement of proper motions in the SN 1006 remnant (G327.6+14.6) based entirely on digital images. CCD images from three epochs spanning a period of 11 yr are used: 1987 from Las Campanas and 1991 and 1998 from Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory. The filaments in SN 1006 are nonradiative, appearing only in the Balmer lines of hydrogen. Delicate filaments—probably thin sheets seen in projection—delineate the shock front along the northwestern rim of the remnant. We use the center of curvature of the filaments to define a convenient geometry and integrate along short segments to obtain one-dimensional profiles. These remain unchanged, within seeing and statistical errors, from one epoch to another. Measuring the shift in a direction perpendicular to the filaments, we obtain proper motions of 280 ± 8 mas yr-1 along the entire length where the filaments are well defined, with little systematic variation along the filaments. In addition to the measurements of the well-defined filaments in the northwest of SN 1006, we also report very deep Hα imaging observations of the entire remnant that clearly show very faint emission surrounding almost the entire shell, as well as some diffuse emission regions in the (projected) interior. Combining the proper-motion measurement with a recent measurement of the shock velocity based on spectra of the same filaments by Ghavamian et al. leads to a distance of 2.18 ± 0.08 kpc to SN 1006. Several lines of argument suggest that SN 1006 was a Type Ia event, so the improved distance measurement can be combined with the peak luminosity for SNe Ia, as recently determined for events in galaxies with Cepheid-based distances, to calculate the apparent brightness of the spectacular event that drew wide attention in the 11th century. The result, Vmax = -7.5 ± 0.4, lies squarely in the middle of the wide range of estimates based on the historical observations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52426eea6dfe92e89faf772af11bf0066aaac299

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. K. Shen
  2. Rüdiger Pakmor
  3. Dean M. Townsley
  4. Broxton J. Miles
  5. M. Kromer
  6. R. Foley
  7. B. Gänsicke
  8. J. Guillochon

In Instrumentation

  1. D. Koester
  2. C. Badenes
  3. J. Schwab
  4. R. Foley
  5. B. Gänsicke
  6. N. Langer
  7. Morgan Fraser
  8. S. Toonen

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Rüdiger Pakmor
  2. C. Badenes
  3. R. Foley
  4. M. Kromer
  5. N. Langer
  6. Eduardo Bravo
  7. J. P. Hughes
  8. Morgan Fraser

Citations in the corpus