Basic concepts on heavy metal soil bioremediation

By C. Garbisu, I. Alkorta, Unidad de Biofísica. 2003

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Field crops for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated land. A review (2010, background): “The latter capacity has practically opened up the way to phytoextraction (Garbisu and Alkorta 2003; Van der Lelie et al. 2001).”
Phytoremediation of heavy metals--concepts and applications. (2013, background): “It is suitable for application at very large field sites where other remediation methods are not cost effective or practicable (Garbisu and Alkorta, 2003).”
Heavy Metal Polluted Soils: Effect on Plants and Bioremediation Methods (2014, background): “It is suitable when the pollutants cover a wide area and when they are within the root zone of the plant [76].”
Bioremediation of heavy metals in food industry: Application of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2019, background): “Manganese may enter the surface water, groundwater, and soil and cause contamination [55,56,57,58].”
Phytoremediation : principles and perspectives (2003, background): “This particular capacity to accumulate and tolerate large metal concentrations has opened up the possibility to use phytoextraction for remediation of polluted soils and waters [58, 131].”
Natural carriers in bioremediation: A review (2016, background): “Bioremediation is eco-friendly, non-invasive, cheaper than conventional methods, and it is a permanent solution that can end with degradation or transformation of environmental contaminants into harmless or less toxic forms [23,24,25,26].”