Antibody landscapes after influenza virus infection or vaccination

By J. M. Fonville, S. Wilks, Sarah James, A. Fox, Mario Ventresca, Malet Aban, L. Xue, T. Jones, N. Le, Q. T. Pham and 24 more. 2014

434 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We introduce the antibody landscape, a method for the quantitative analysis of antibody-mediated immunity to antigenically variable pathogens, achieved by accounting for antigenic variation among pathogen strains. We generated antibody landscapes to study immune profiles covering 43 years of influenza A/H3N2 virus evolution for 69 individuals monitored for infection over 6 years and for 225 individuals pre- and postvaccination. Upon infection and vaccination, titers increased broadly, including previously encountered viruses far beyond the extent of cross-reactivity observed after a primary infection. We explored implications for vaccination and found that the use of an antigenically advanced virus had the dual benefit of inducing antibodies against both advanced and previous antigenic clusters. These results indicate that preemptive vaccine updates may improve influenza vaccine efficacy in previously exposed individuals. Preemptive vaccine updates may substantially improve influenza vaccine efficacy in previously exposed individuals. [Also see Perspective by Lessler] Hills and valleys of influenza infection Each one of us may encounter several different strains of the ever-changing influenza virus during a lifetime. Scientists can now summarize such histories of infection over a lifetime of exposure. Fonville et al. visualize the interplay between protective responses and the evasive influenza virus by a technique called antibody landscape modeling (see the Perspective by Lessler). Landscapes reveal how exposure to new strains of the virus boost immune responses and indicate possibilities for optimizing future vaccination programs. Science, this issue p. 996; see also p. 919

Subfields: Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

  1. Aleksandra M. Walczak
  2. Ville Mustonen
  3. Barney S. Graham
  4. James O. Lloyd-Smith
  5. Michael Lässig
  6. Trevor Bedford
  7. Michael Worobey
  8. Monique Renee Ambrose

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Ville Mustonen
  2. Aleksandra M. Walczak
  3. Neil P. King
  4. M. Kanekiyo
  5. Daniel Ellis
  6. David Baker
  7. Michael Lässig
  8. Barney S. Graham

Citations in the corpus