Taxonomic distinctness as a measure of diversity applied over a large scale: the benthos of the Norwegian continental shelf

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the use of abiotic surrogates to describe marine benthic biodiversity (2010, unknown): “(Ellingsen et al., 2005) Depth and depth”
An easy-to-use index of ecological integrity for prioritizing freshwater sites and for assessing habitat quality (2009, background): “distance has gained impetus in environmental assessment (Heino et al. 2007; Ellingsen et al. 2005; Mouillot et al. 2005; Clarke and Warwick 1998).”
Biodiversity of Aquatic Insects: Spatial Gradients and Environmental Correlates of Assemblage-Level Measures at Large Scales (2009, unknown): “Taxonomic distinctness indices have been widely used in marine studies (Warwick & Clarke, 1998; Rogers et al., 1999; Ellingsen et al., 2005), but research on the taxonomic variability of assemblages has just begun with aquatic insects.”
Beta diversity and taxonomic sufficiency: Do higher‐level taxa reflect heterogeneity in species composition? (2009, background): “…and Distributions, 15, 450–458, Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd molluscs, we consider that measures that are influenced by taxonomic relatedness are more meaningful when applied to a single phylum than to all taxa combined (Ellingsen et al., 2005; Chainho et al., 2007).”