Durability of resistance against fungal, bacterial and viral pathogens; present situation

By J. Parlevliet. Euphytica, 2002

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51fe0dc7b9a360b92b61fb6049ead7a1f21d710f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Diego Rubiales
2. A. Ciancio
3. M. Sorrells
4. P. Lindhout
5. J. Rutkoski
6. T. Glare

In Plant Science

1. M. Sorrells
2. Jean-Luc Jannink
3. Jesse Poland
4. R. Singh
5. J. Rutkoski
6. E. Heffner
7. Diego Rubiales
8. J. C. Sillero

Citations in the corpus

• Coffee resistance to the main diseases: leaf rust and coffee berry disease (2006, background): “Thus, although this type of resistance is the most frequently deployed in plant breeding, the great disadvantage is that it is often non-durable (Vale et al., 2001; Lindhout, 2002; Niks and Rubiales, 2002; Parlevliet, 2002).”
• Genomic Selection for Quantitative Adult Plant Stem Rust Resistance in Wheat (2014, background): “Quantitative resistance is usually considered more durable than that conferred by pathogen recognition genes (Parlevliet, 2002); however, it must be improved over multiple cycles of selection using well-managed screening nurseries for evaluation.”
• Screening techniques and sources of resistance to foliar diseases caused by major necrotrophic fungi in grain legumes (2006, background): “The potential use of non-specific resistance, the effect of numerous genes acting on distinct resistance parameters exerting less pressure on the pathogen, is thought to make the available resistance more durable over time (Parlevliet, 2002).”
• The reproductive potential of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita is affected by selection for virulence against major resistance genes from tomato and pepper (2011, background): “…of virulent pathogens on susceptible plants has been abundantly reported for bacteria, fungi and viruses (e.g., Vera-Cruz et al. 2000; Jenner et al. 2002; Parlevliet 2002; Desbiez et al. 2003; Lecoq et al. 2004; Ayme et al. 2007; Sacristan and García-Arenal 2008; Janzac et al. 2009; 2010).”
• Genomic selection for durable stem rust resistance in wheat (2011, background): “We focus on quantitative APR because combining multiple genes of small effect can lead to high levels of resistance (Singh et al. 2000), and sources of quantitative resistance in crop plants have proven to be highly durable ( Parlevliet 2002 ), We therefore consider improving levels of APR a promisi”
• The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. (2003, background): “The most widely cited examples of durable resistance against bacterial or fungal pathogens have involved supposedly complex, multigenic quantitative traits (Johnson, 1984; Parlevliet, 2002).”
• The perspectives of polygenic resistance in breeding for durable disease resistance (2002, background): “Generally, the least durable resistance genes are HR genes that act against obligate biotrophic fungi (Parlevliet, 2002).”
• Improved Resistance Management for Durable Disease Control: A Case Study of Phoma Stem Canker of Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus) (2005, background): “Lastly, genetic control of fungal, bacterial and viral plant pathogens can also lack durability (McDonald and Linde, 2002; Parlevliet, 2002).”