HTN planning for Web Service composition using SHOP2

859 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Automated composition of Web services via planning in asynchronous domains (2005, methodology): “, based on OWL-S or WSML, is presented in [90,59,43].”
Semantic Web Service Composition Planning with OWLS-Xplan (2005, background): “This yields a higher degree of ﬂexibility compared to pure HTN planners like SHOP2 (Sirin et al. 2004) whereas the use of predeﬁned workﬂows or methods improves the ef-ﬁciency of the FF-planner.”
Bringing Semantics to Web Services with OWL-S (2007, methodology): “In a similar spirit, other researchers [39, 80] have used the paradigm of Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning [58] to perform automated Web Service composition.”
Automatic Composition of Transition-based Semantic Web Services with Messaging (2005, background): “Several works on automatic composition of OWL-S services exists, e.g., [15, 16, 18].”
Automated Planning and Acting (2016, methodology): “Moreover, planning and ontologies have been used in several approaches to composition of semantic Web services, most of them based on the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and OWL-S (OWL for Services), which is a language for implementing the DL formalism (see, for example, [544, 365, 417, 554]).”
Web services composition: A decade's overview (2014, methodology): “– Sirin et al. Sirin et al. [79] adopt Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning to address the problem of automated Web services composition.”