Online Biofilm Monitoring
By P. Janknecht, L. Melo. 2003
99 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A review of online biofilm monitoring techniques is presented focusing on methods based on differential turbidimetry, light scattering, heat transfer, pressure drop, real-time measurement of metabolic products, image analysis, radiation signals (spectroscopy, fluorometry, photoacoustic spectroscopy, etc.), electric and mechanical (vibration) signals. The different methods are compared in terms of their applicability to practical situations and the know detection limits are reported.
Subfields: Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51c027e79255a0ee956b9a73fc1e18812e1bebfe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Bioengineering
In Biomedical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Biofilm formation and the food industry, a focus on the bacterial outer surface (2010, methodology): “Several methods are commonly used like conventional total viable count, different microscopy and spectroscopy techniques, impedance measurements and ATP determination [reviewed by Wirtanen et al. (2000); Verran et al. (2002); Janknecht and Melo (2003)].”
- Chemical and physical methods for characterisation of biofilms (2007, background): “Janknecht and Melo [37] presented a review of on-”
- New Understandings of Biocorrosion Mechanisms and their Classifications (2012, methodology): “Using an active electrochemical method such as Electrical Resistance (ER) and Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR) for biocorrosion measurement or biofilm detection is questionable because such methods may interfere with the native electron transport/corrosion process [17].”
- Microbial Biofouling: Unsolved Problems, Insufficient Approaches, and Possible Solutions (2011, background): “This is the case for advanced surface monitoring (Flemming 2003; Janknecht and Melo 2003).”