Assessing Assault Self-Reports by Batterer Program Participants and Their Partners

By D. Heckert, E. Gondolf. Journal of Family Violence, 2000

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51b7003f131a36420ad0d65ad246fffe564f0619

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. M. J. Rogers
2. E. Gondolf
3. D. Follingstad

In Gender Studies

1. M. J. Rogers
2. E. Gondolf
3. D. Follingstad

In Health

1. M. J. Rogers
2. E. Gondolf
3. D. Follingstad

Citations in the corpus

• The weak evidence for batterer program alternatives (2011, background): “Moreover, getting reliable information about the men's violence at program intake, as well as from women in crisis or under threat, can be problematic (see Heckert & Gondolf, 2000a, 2000b).”
• Validity Concerns in the Measurement of Women’s and Men’s Report of Intimate Partner Violence (2013, background): “Underreporting was more likely to involve understatement of the severity of events rather than the occurrence of events (Heckert and Gondolf 2000) which likely occurred because men were aware that their data would be crosschecked with their partners.”