Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice.

By J. Wheeler, E. Grist, K. Leung, D. Morritt, M. Crane. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2002

432 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/516fecd352486d68c90cc33cf5d3bc021798e6f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. B. Kefford
2. D. Nugegoda
3. C. Palmer
4. J. Meador

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. C. Palmer
2. B. Kefford
3. D. Nugegoda
4. J. Meador

Citations in the corpus

• What is Meant by “95% of Species”? An Argument for the Inclusion of Rapid Tolerance Testing (2005, methodology): “If this occurred then the findings of Newman et al. (2000), Wheeler et al. (2002), and others would have underestimated the number of species required for estimating the SSDs.”
• Rationale and Procedures for Using the Tissue-Residue Approach for Toxicity Assessment and Determination of Tissue, Water, and Sediment Quality Guidelines for Aquatic Organisms (2006, background): “Often, the lower 95th percentile confidence interval for the HC05 point estimate is selected as the concentration for protection (Newman et al. 2000; Wheeler et al. 2002).”