Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs

By Alfred D. French. Cellulose, 2014

2,974 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Archeology, Biomaterials, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/516e5190da8a8fd3277da1b73d6e576f66903670

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Archeology

In Biomaterials

In Mechanical Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Untreated and alkali treated fibers from Alfa stem: effect of alkali treatment on structural, morphological and thermal features (2015, methodology): “The assignment of Miller indices for each peak was performed by using theMercury 3.0 program as explained by French (2014).”
Utilization of pineapple peel for production of nanocellulose and film application (2018, background): “6 , corresponding to the (1-10)/(110) overlapping, (200), and (004) planes of the typical structure of cellulose Ib, respectively (French 2014; Feng et al. 2015).”
Increment in evolution of cellulose crystallinity analysis (2020, methodology): “…to mimic the peaks that arise from model crystals of a size similar to most cellulosic samples (a few nanometers), it appears that much of the intensity formerly attributed to ‘‘background’’ or ‘‘amorphous scatter’’ is just the overlapped intensity from adjacent crystalline peaks (French 2014).”
Sodium periodate oxidation of cellulose nanocrystal and its application as a paper wet strength additive (2015, methodology): “The crystallinity of the samples was determined based on the Segal method (Segal et al. 1959), which took into account the ratio between the height of the (200) peak (I200) and the lowest height between the (200) and (1–10) peaks (Iam) (French 2014).”
Characterization of natural cellulose fiber from corn stalk waste subjected to different surface treatments (2019, background): “…of the corn stem fiber presented major peaks at 2h angles of approximately 15.54 , 16.28 , 22.12 and 34.54 , corresponding to lattice planes of peak 1 ((1–10)), peak 2 ((110)), peak 3 ((200)) and peak 4 ((004)) for cellulose I crystallites (French 2014; Dong et al. 2014; Jayaramudu et al. 2010).”
Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review (2015, background): “It is worth mentioning here that many samples such as partially mercerized fibers consist of more than one crystal form (a mixture of cellulose I and II), and it is important not to assume that only one form exists in their diffraction patterns (French, 2014).”
Comparison of sample crystallinity determination methods by X-ray diffraction for challenging cellulose I materials (2016, background): “Using the peak weight parameters from Paakkari et al. (1988) and the relative peak heights for cellulose Ib from French (2014), the difference in total intensity of the major diffraction peaks (110, 110, 102, 200 and 004) between symmetrical reflection and symmetrical transmission is approximately…”
Preparation of cellulose nanofiber from softwood pulp by ball milling (2015, methodology): “This peak position is similar to that of the cellulose-Ia with random orientation of the crystallites, but a lower angle than that of cellulose-Ib crystal structure (French 2014).”
Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose (2019, background): “2a in French (2014) (Viëtor et al. 2002; French 2012; Phyo et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2018).”
Effect of alkali treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of individual bamboo fibers (2016, background): “6, two characteristic peaks in the XRD patten of untreated bamboo fiber were observed at 2h = 16.01 and 22.25 , which correspond to typical cellulose I with crystallities having preferred orientation along the fiber axis (indicated by reduced tensity near 34.7 ) (French 2014).”