The Heterogeneity of Socially Responsible Investment

By J. Sandberg, Carmen Juravle, Ted Martin Hedesström, Ian M. Hamilton. 2009

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Finance, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5162364e7b98872ea310076e20cc5dd04f2311a4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. Gaurav Talan
2. Gagan Deep Sharma
3. Christian Klein
4. Bert Scholtens

In Finance

1. Gagan Deep Sharma
2. Gaurav Talan
3. Elena Escrig-Olmedo
4. Pieter Jan Trinks
5. Anna Katharina Höchstädter
6. Matt Wallis
7. B. Scheck
8. Christian Klein

In Strategy and Management

1. Gagan Deep Sharma
2. Gaurav Talan
3. Pieter Jan Trinks
4. Anna Katharina Höchstädter
5. María Jesús Muñoz-Torres
6. María Ángeles Fernández-Izquierdo
7. Elena Escrig-Olmedo
8. Idoya Ferrero-Ferrero

Citations in the corpus

• The Opportunity Cost of Negative Screening in Socially Responsible Investing (2017, background): “However, these instances of screening face severe problems as well, including informational complexity, large differences in measuring methods, and a lack of clarity and transparency on specific methodologies (Margolis et al. 2009; Sandberg et al. 2009).”
• Ethical requirement and financial interest: a literature review on socially responsible investing (2015, background): “Sandberg et al. (2009) state that cultural differences might be one explanation for heterogeneity in the field of SRI and that it is quite unlikely that these differences might be resolved in the near future.”
• A Social Movement Perspective on Finance: How Socially Responsible Investment Mattered (2010, background): “Despite the global spread of the SRI movement, research has indicated that the SRI movement has differed extensively both in practice and in principle in different countries (Louche and Lydenberg, 2006; Bengtsson, 2008; Sakuma and Louche, 2008; Sandberg et al., 2009).”
• Rating the Raters: Evaluating how ESG Rating Agencies Integrate Sustainability Principles (2019, background): “The diverse methodologies seem to be associated to a market-led strategy of differentiation [22] and to cultural and ideological factors [28].”
• Doing Well by Doing Good: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda for Sustainable Investment (2019, background): “Despite ambiguity and overlap in the terms used for sustainable investment, heterogeneity of these terms is possible on terminological, definitional, strategic, and practical levels [36].”