Conservation Report: Setting Conservation Priorities for Landbirds in the United States: The Partners in Flight Approach

By Michael F. Carter, W. C. Hunter, D. Pashley, K. Rosenberg. 2000

240 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/515f01e7e7944c49b3d1c704adc4186c071967ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. W. Link
2. John R. Sauer
3. D. Niven
4. D. Cimprich
5. L. T. Hunter
6. J. Bart
7. Jedediah F. Brodie
8. James D. Nichols

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Jedediah F. Brodie
2. W. Link

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. John R. Sauer
2. W. Link
3. D. Niven
4. J. Henne-Kerr
5. J. Bart
6. R. Randy Wilson
7. Jedediah F. Brodie
8. D. Twedt

Citations in the corpus

• Is research effort allocated efficiently for conservation? Felidae as a global case study (2009, background): “…of resources (e.g. funding, antipoaching efforts, research projects, habitat protection and restoration, community conservation, political pressure, etc.) should be positively related to threat status (USFWS 1983; Robbins et al. 1989; Siriwardena et al. 1998; Carter et al. 2000; Dunn 2002).”
• DOUBLE SAMPLING TO ESTIMATE DENSITY AND POPULATION TRENDS IN BIRDS (2002, background): “THE NEED FOR accurate estimates of trends in avian abundance, and in some cases for estimates of absolute population size, is well acknowledged (Ralph et al. 1995, Carter et al. 2000, Beisinger et al. 2000, O’Connor et al. 2000).”
• Avian Response to Bottomland Hardwood Reforestation: The First 10 Years (2002, methodology): “…density for each species (territories/ 100 ha) and its respective Partners in Flight (PIF) prioritization score (Colorado Bird Observatory 1998; Carter et al. 2000) within the Mississippi Alluvial Valley as Estimates of daily nest survival were calculated (Mayfield 1961, 1975) and their…”
• CONSERVING STOPOVER SITES FOR FOREST-DWELLING MIGRATORY LANDBIRDS (2005, background): “Most of these conservation strategies have begun by identifying species of high conservation priority (Carter et al. 2000, Donovan et al. 2002).”
• A Hierarchical Model for Regional Analysis of Population Change Using Christmas Bird Count Data, with Application to the American Black Duck (2006, background): “…model, composite regional indices and trends are derived parameters, and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations allow the direct estimation of a variety of additional derived quantities such as area importance scores (Carter et al. 2000) and population stability metrics (Sauer and Link 2002b).”
• WCS Working Paper No. 24 - Setting conservation and research priorities for larger African carnivores (2005, background): “It capitalizes on the strength of several previous works that have evaluated objective sets of criteria for scoring frameworks, notably priority setting for vertebrates in Florida (Millsap et al. 1990) and the Partners in Flight approaches (Beissinger et al. 2000; Carter et al. 2000).”