Endogenous Growth and Cross-Country Income Differences

By Peter Howitt. 2000

724 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5150771214c8a9d4682fc26e32126116fbb3d439

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Spatial Heterogeneity in Knowledge, Innovation, and Economic Growth Nexus: Conceptual Reflections and Empirical Evidence (2014, background): “…concentrated picture of knowledge creation (and thus innovation) activities in space (see among many others Acs et al., 1994; Anselin et al., 2000; Howitt, 2000; Acemoglu et al., 2006; Fritsch and Slavetch, 2007; Rodrı́guez-Pose and Crescenzi, 2008; Sterlacchini, 2008; Ertur and Koch, 2011;…”
Empirical evidence of income dynamics across EU regions (2006, background): “…developments (R&D) spillovers may give place to a particular form of club convergence, in which only a selected group of economies performing R&D tends to reach the same growth rate in the long run, while all the others stagnate, as they cannot take advantage of technology transfer (Howitt, 2000).”
Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi‐Endogenous Growth Theory (2007, background): “See Pack (1994), Coe and Helpman (1995), Jones (1995a, 1995b), Aghion and Howitt (1998b), Parente and Prescott (1999), Howitt (2000) , Arora (2001), Zachariadis (2003), Aghion et al. (2005), Aghion, Howitt and Mayer-Foulkes (2005) and Howitt and Mayer-Foulkes (2005).”
International Output Convergence, Breaks, and Asymmetric Adjustment (2011, background): “This is the case in, amongst others, Loewy and Papell (1996), Li and Papell (1999), Datta (2003) and Bentzen (2005) who find more supportive evidence in favor of deterministic convergence in different contexts.”
Flows of people, flows of ideas, and the inequality of nations (2011, background): “Recent notable contributions include Lucas (1993), Howitt (2000), and Eaton and Kortum (2002).”
R&D and Absorptive Capacity: Theory and Empirical Evidence* (2003, background): “We follow Aghion and Howitt (1998) and Howitt (2000) in allowing the size of innovations Γi to be a function of a country’s distance behind the technological frontier.”
The Anatomy of Growth in the OECD since 1870: the Transformation from the Post-Malthusian Growth Regime to the Modern Growth Epoch (2009, background): “The Schumpeterian models of Aghion and Howitt (1998), Peretti (1998), Howitt (1999), Howitt (2000), Peretti and Smulders (2002), and Aghion, Boustan, Hoxby, Vadenbussche (2005), maintain scale effects from first-generation endogenous growth models but assume that the effectiveness of R&D dilutes,…”
Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: theory and evidence (2007, background): “These international spillovers come from international trade and the role of foreign R&D (Coe and Helpman 1995, Eaton and Kortum 1996), or technology transfers (Barro and Sala-i-Martin 1997, Howitt 2000) or human capital externalities (Lucas 1993).”
Growth with Quality-Improving Innovations: An Integrated Framework (2005, background): “Howitt (2000) , who took the cross-sectoral-spillovers variant of the closed-economy model described in section 2.3 above and allowed the spillovers to cross international as well as intersectoral borders.”
CO2 Emissions, Research and Technology Transfer in China (2009, neutral): “Second, there is a growing literature suggesting that domestic research activity plays a crucial role in facilitating the transfer of foreign technology (see Howitt, 2000; Griffith et al. 2003, 2004; Cameron et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2005).”