The “flying geese” model of Asian economic development: origin, theoretical extensions, and regional policy implications

By K. Kojima. 2000

371 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The regional nature of Japanese multinational business (2008, result): “Our findings are also in accord with some classic work by Kojima (2000).”
Endowment Structures, Industrial Dynamics, and Economic Growth (2009, methodology): “C(t) = C(t0)e (t t0) for any t t0: (17)”
THE FLYING GEESE PARADIGM: A CRITICAL STUDY OF ITS APPLICATION TO EAST ASIAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT (2004, background): “Thus the interaction between, and parallel progress in the rationalization and diversification of production could stimulate the industrial development of the national economy (Kojima, 2000:379).”
International Production and Distribution Networks in East Asia: Eighteen Facts, Mechanics, and Policy Implications* (2006, background): “The idea of the “flying geese” development pattern and pro-trade FDI well explained the transition of industry-wise comparative advantage in this period (see, for example, Kojima, 2000).”
Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research (2018, neutral): “It further suggests that notions of a geographically based pattern towards development—such as the ‘Asian development model’ (Kojima, 2000)—may be missing part of the larger picture.”