Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter

By Courtenay Honeycutt, Susan C. Herring. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2009

1,043 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51478c9af77eb1e77486c0141ee208fc00463ffc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Political Polarization on Twitter (2011, background): “Mentions function differently, allowing someone to address a specific user directly through the public feed, or, to a lesser extent, refer to an individual in the third person (Honeycutt and Herring 2008).”
Twitinfo: aggregating and visualizing microblogs for event exploration (2011, background): “Though analysis and conversation does appear on Twitter [12, 5], for many events Twitter is better described as a medium for quick reactions and information sharing.”
Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks (2014, background): “…et al., 2011; Cha et al., 2010), the dynamics of information exchange (boyd et al., 2010; Cha et al., 2012; Gaffney, 2010; Gonç alves et al., 2011; Honey and Herring, 2009), the existence of polarisation (boyd et al., 2010; Conover et al., 2011), and how information propagates from user to user…”
Modeling Users' Activity on Twitter Networks: Validation of Dunbar's Number (2011, methodology): “3 Effect of Network’s Properties Inspired by several studies [3, 5, 6, 2] we fix the baseline of our model using scale-free networks.”
More than words: Social networks' text mining for consumer brand sentiments (2013, background): “As opposed to the hashtag, the @ character has been introduced to address a tweet to another follower, which allows Twitter to function effectively as a collaboration and conversation system (Honeycutt & Herring, 2009).”
Sentiment in Twitter events (2011, methodology): “In contrast, the @ symbol is used to address a post to another registered Twitter user, allowing Twitter to be used quite effectively for conversations and collaboration (Honeycutt & Herring, 2009).”
Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter (2011, background): “Honeycutt and Herring [11] and Boyd et al. [3] both discuss retweet syntax, and the role of retweeting in Twitter discourse.”
Posting, commenting, and tagging: Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook (2015, background): “Tweets with @ mentions of specific users are more interactive and draw in more conversation (Honeycutt & Herring, 2009).”
Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter (2010, background): “Like those conversations that take place through @replies [9], some retweet conversations are small and local while others prompt a huge thread.”
Microblogging Inside and Outside the Workplace (2010, background): “The few published studies on the use of microblogging suggest that it can be useful for sharing information, keeping up to date on current events, and having broadcast or directed communication with others (Honeycutt and Herring 2009; Huberman, Romero and Wu 2009; Java et al. 2007; Naaman, Boase and”
Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media (2011, methodology): “URLs We extract URLs from tweets by matching strings of valid URL characters that begin with ‘http://.’ Honeycutt and Herring (2008) suggest that URLs are associated with the transmission of information on Twitter.”
Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign (2012, methodology): “While microblogging in general has evolved towards becoming ‘more conversational and collaborative’ (Honeycutt and Herring, 2009: 10), Golbeck et al. (2010) found such use to be limited among the politicians.”
Rumor has it: Identifying Misinformation in Microblogs (2011, background): “Previous work has discussed the role of URLs in information diffusion on Twitter (Honeycutt and Herring, 2009).”