Priming of Syntactic Rules in Task-Oriented Dialogue and Spontaneous Conversation

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Lexical and Syntactic Adaptation and Their Impact in Deployed Spoken Dialog Systems (2009, background): “…and lexical choices in conversation to those of their conversational partners, both human (Brennan, 1996; Pickering et al., 2000; Lockridge and Brennan, 2002; Reitter et al., 2006) and computer (Branigan et al., 2003; Brennan, 1991; Bren-nan, 1996; Gustafson et al., 1997; Ward and Litman, 2007).”
Chameleons in Imagined Conversations: A New Approach to Understanding Coordination of Linguistic Style in Dialogs (2011, background): “(Pickering and Garrod, 2004; Reitter et al., 2006)?”
Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue (2014, background): “Classical structural priming effects are strong: around 10% for syntactic rules (Reitter et al., 2006).”
Implicit Learning and Syntactic Persistence: Surprisal and Cumulativity (2007, background): “Most experimental studies have found that there is no effect of prime-target distance (Bock & Griffin, 2000; Bock et al., in press), while corpus studies have mostly found persistence to decay logarithmically with distance (Gries, 2005; Szmrecs´ anyi, 2005; Reitter, Moore, & Keller, 2006, but see ”