The advocacy coalition framework: application to the policy process for the development of forest certification in Sweden

By C. Elliott, R. Schlaepfer. 2001

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/513144890a1588e19558ae14b7bb835c82780791

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Michael Howlett
2. J. Rayner

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Michael Howlett
2. J. Rayner
3. Chris Tollefson
4. Karoline S. Rogge
5. F. Kern
6. P. D. del Río
7. Ishan Mukherjee
8. J. J. Woo

In Strategy and Management

1. Michael Howlett
2. J. Rayner
3. H. Keskitalo
4. J. Johansson
5. E. Carina
6. C. Sandström
7. M. Tysiachniouk
8. P. D. del Río

Citations in the corpus

• From government to governance in forest planning? Lessons from the case of the British Columbia Great Bear Rainforest initiative (2009, background): “These activities created new roles in the policy process, not only for forest products corporations and forest dependent communities but also “downstream” wholesalers and retailers of wood products and consumers (Elliott and Schlaepfer, 2001).”
• Research, part of a Special Feature on Understanding Adaptive Capacity in Forest Governance Local Consequences of Applying International Norms: Differences in the Application of Forest Certification in Northern Sweden, Northern Finland, and Northwest Russia (2009, background): “…buyers to require certified wood, by again applying a naming and shaming tactic: “[t]hese retailers did not want to be identified by the NGOs as selling environmentally ‘unfriendly’ products and saw certification as a guarantee for them and their customers” (Elliott and Schlaepfer 2001:659).”