Slow Feature Analysis: Unsupervised Learning of Invariances
By Laurenz Wiskott, Terrence J. Sejnowski. 2002
1,547 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Cognitive Neuroscience, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Analytical Chemistry
- Aapo Hyvärinen
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Nitish Srivastava
- Hiroshi Morioka
- Yoshua Bengio
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Kristen Grauman
- Andrew Y. Ng
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Sergey Levine
- Yann LeCun
- Yoshua Bengio
- Tomaso A. Poggio
- Joel Z. Leibo
- Andrew Y. Ng
- Kristen Grauman
In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
- Yoshua Bengio
- Yann LeCun
- Kristen Grauman
- Trevor Darrell
- Sergey Levine
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Ishan Misra
- Andrea Vedaldi
In Signal Processing
- Yoshua Bengio
- Dong Yu
- Wei-Ning Hsu
- Shinji Watanabe
- James R. Glass
- Jinyu Li
- Hung-yi Lee
- Abdel-rahman Mohamed
Citations in the corpus
- What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning? (2016, background): “The most well-known such criteria are image reconstruction [7, 38, 31, 29, 34, 23] (see [6] for a comprehensive overview) and feature slowness [48, 18].”
- Self-Supervised Learning of Video-Induced Visual Invariances (2019, background): “As a result, and with the recent emergence of research video data sets [1, 59], videos have been investigated in the context of self-supervision (for example, [40, 64, 63, 28, 65, 73, 41, 51, 42, 3, 2]).”
- Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Coding (2019, methodology): “This resulted in some early attempts to structure representations with losses that did not rely on reconstruction: notably, slow feature analysis [19, 63] used the persistence of objects in videos to learn representations that generalized across views.”
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A New Approach to Self-Supervised Learning (2020, background): “Learning good image representations is a key challenge in computer vision [1, 2, 3] as it allows for efficient training on downstream tasks [4, 5, 6, 7].”
- Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding (2018, background): “These ’slow features’ [13] that span many time steps are often more interesting (e.g., phonemes and intonation in speech, objects in images, or the story line in books.).”
- Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Prediction (2015, background): “This kind of temporal coherence has a long history in visual learning literature [18, 56], and contemporaneous work shows strong improvements on modern detection datasets [54].”
- Multi-task Self-Supervised Visual Learning (2017, background): “ temporally order a set of frames sampled from a video [23]. Another is to note that objects generally appear across many frames: thus, we can train features to remain invariant as a video progresses [11, 24, 42, 43, 47]. Finally, motion cues can separate foreground objects from background. Neural n”
- Learning Robust and Multilingual Speech Representations (2020, neutral): “On the other hand, if the model predicts further in the future, the representations will need to infer “slow features” (Wiskott and Sejnowski, 2002); more global structures such as phonemes, words and utterances in speech.”
- Learning to See by Moving (2015, background): “Another line of work has focused on learning features that are invariant to transformations irrelevant to the identity of objects, either from images [14, 34], or from video [41].”
- Learning Image Representations Tied to Ego-Motion (2015, methodology): “Most relevant to our work are feature learning methods based on temporal coherence and “slow feature analysis” [32, 10, 22].”
- Time-Contrastive Networks: Self-Supervised Learning from Video (2017, background): “A number of prior works use temporal coherence [28, 29, 30, 31].”
- Video (language) modeling: a baseline for generative models of natural videos (2014, methodology): “Wiskott & Sejnowski (2002) have proposed instead a method based on slowness of features through time, an idea later extended in a bilinear model by Gregor & LeCun (2010).”
- Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations Using Videos (2015, background): “Therefore, researchers have started focusing on learning feature representations using videos [11, 53, 27, 43, 56, 16, 48, 34, 45].”
- UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Self-Supervised Video Representation Learning With Odd-One-Out Networks (neutral): “Exploiting the spatio-temporal coherence in videos has been investigated before for unsupervised learning [3, 32, 45].”
- Toward Causal Representation Learning (2021, background): “The hypothesis is also related to ideas of looking for features that vary slowly [70], [270].”
- Deep learning in neural networks: An overview (2014, methodology): “RL combined with UL based on Slow Feature Analysis (Wiskott and Sejnowski, 2002; Kompella et al., 2012) enabled a real humanoid robot to learn skills from raw high-dimensional video streams (Luciw et al.”