Revisiting RCNN: On Awakening the Classification Power of Faster RCNN

By Bowen Cheng, Yunchao Wei, Humphrey Shi, Rogério Schmidt Feris, Jinjun Xiong, Thomas S. Huang. 2018

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent region-based object detectors are usually built with separate classification and localization branches on top of shared feature extraction networks. In this paper, we analyze failure cases of state-of-the-art detectors and observe that most hard false positives result from classification instead of localization. We conjecture that: (1) Shared feature representation is not optimal due to the mismatched goals of feature learning for classification and localization; (2) multi-task learning helps, yet optimization of the multi-task loss may result in sub-optimal for individual tasks; (3) large receptive field for different scales leads to redundant context information for small objects.We demonstrate the potential of detector classification power by a simple, effective, and widely-applicable Decoupled Classification Refinement (DCR) network. DCR samples hard false positives from the base classifier in Faster RCNN and trains a RCNN-styled strong classifier. Experiments show new state-of-the-art results on PASCAL VOC and COCO without any bells and whistles.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Chunhua Shen
  2. Jianfeng Gao
  3. Alan L. Yuille
  4. Luc Van Gool
  5. Liang-Chieh Chen
  6. Yi Yang
  7. Dacheng Tao
  8. Yunchao Wei

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Xiaogang Wang
  4. Chunhua Shen
  5. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  6. Yi Yang
  7. Alan L. Yuille
  8. Trevor Darrell

Citations in the corpus