Conceptualizing adventurous nature sport: A positive psychology perspective
By S. Houge Mackenzie, E. Brymer. Annals of Leisure Research, 2018
101 citations recorded by the source corpus.
ABSTRACT Research and public policy has long supported links between traditional sports and well-being. However, adventurous nature sport literature has primarily focused on performance issues and deficit models of risk or sensation-seeking. This standpoint is limited by assumptions that participation is: (a) dependent on personality structures; (b) solely motivated by risk-taking and hedonism; (c) only attractive or accessible to a narrow demographic; and (d) widely perceived as dysfunctional or deviant. In contrast, recent research suggests that adventurous nature sports provide unique benefits due to their context. This paper critically assesses the validity of dominant perspectives against emerging literature to illustrate how nature sports can be conceptualized through a positive psychology lens as well-being activities that facilitate both hedonic and eudaimonic outcomes. The significance of this perspective is that nature sports may become an important consideration when designing health and well-being interventions for both people and the planet.
Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/510821710d1dc3bc367c69fbf9829e0183a72644
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Adventure recreation and subjective well-being: a conceptual framework (2020, background): “…the ‘black box’1 issue persists in the adventure literature (Shellman, 2011), while subjective well-being (SWB) frameworks and outcomes remain largely absent from discourse and analyses in adventure studies (Durr, 2009; see Houge Mackenzie & Brymer, 2018; Lee & Ewert, 2018 for exceptions).”