Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs

By Kyung-Nam Kang, Hayoung Park. 2012

436 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/510193ff8ad0dd67973234764bcbc67e5d07e1c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Open innovation: a new classification and its impact on firm performance in innovative SMEs (2015, background): “Fourth, 'government support' was introduced, as government funding encourages SMEs’ networking and interaction with other innovation actors (Kang and Park, 2012).”
The Role of Government Support in Sustainable Competitive Position and Firm Performance (2018, background): “Moreover, support from the government in term of R & D findings and networking with foreign partners can help to access a strong position in the market which is essential for innovation and performance Kang and Park [35].”
R&D Subsidies as Dual Signals in Technological Collaborations (2019, background): “Kang and Park (2012) Panel data on 147 biotech SMEs (South Korea, 2005-2007) Public funding: binary Collaboration: count number of collaborations (distinguishing partner type) Positive relation between funding and collaborations with both academic and corporate partners (but only if the partners…”
Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China's high-tech industries? (2016, methodology): “It is superior to the non-parametric method in terms of dealing with heterogeneity and outliers (Cooper, et al. 2000; Kumbhakar and Lovell, 2003; Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2007).”
Effectiveness of technology investment: Impact of internal technological capability, networking and investment's strategic importance (2012, background): “Without sufficient internal capability firms are not likely to recognize important development outside of their existing competencies (e.g. Kang and Park, 2012; Cohen and Levinthal, 1990) and this may limit their ability for successful technology investments.”