Firm-Level Corruption in Vietnam

By John Rand, F. Tarp. Economic development and cultural change, 2012

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Corruption, growth, and governance: Private vs. state-owned firms in Vietnam (2012, unknown): “Rand and Tarp (2010) document that in a separate survey also held in 2005 only 37 percent of the firms indicated that they provided informal payments. dummies should thus capture any endogenous effect of growth on our measures of corruption.”
Does Economic Growth Reduce Corruption? Theory and Evidence from Vietnam (2013, unknown): “(4)From a theoretical perspective, Rose-Ackerman (1978) and Shleifer and Vishny (1993) are among the first to argue that competition between bureaucrats can reduce corruption, though they consider a different framework than the one we present here.”
Firm Growth and Corruption: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam (2017, background): “Firms in Vietnam appear to accept these payments as part of the cost of doing business (Rand and Tarp, 2012).”
Corruption, Types of Corruption and Firm Financial Performance: New Evidence from a Transitional Economy (2018, methodology): “In this study, following Rand and Tarp (2012), we measure corruption as a set of variables.”